GLASTONBURY ETHICS COMMISSION; for meeting of January 9, 2006
(1.) ADDENDUM TO MINUTES OF MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2004
Re: Regular Meeting Minutes Item 2, Closed Session
1.) Commissioners held discussion with Atty. Henry Zaccardi concerning pending complaints: Emerick v Glastonbury Ethics Commission.
2.) Commission Chair Sergio distributed copies of a request for Advisory Opinion, which Commissioners agreed to take up at the January meeting. (document on file) (Approved by unanimous vote at Ethics Commission meeting of November 14, 2005 on motion made by Commissioner Spier and seconded by Commissioner Treacy. Commissioner Thomas abstained. Commissioners in attendance were Commissioners Sergio, Spier, Treacy and Thomas.)
AMEND BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING TO ITEM 2.):
Ms. Sergio suggested that the initial consideration should be whether the Commission would have jurisdiction to issue an opinion in the particular case. Brief general discussion indicated agreement with the suggestion. No votes were taken. All conclusions were reached by general agreement, with no objections raised by any Commissioner.
(2.) ADDENDUM TO MINUTES OF MEETING OF JANUARY 10, 2005
Re: Regular Meeting Minutes Item 10, Closed Session
Commissioners discussed a request for an Advisory Opinion from a town official. Commissioners concluded that the Commission did not have jurisdiction in the particular case. Commissioner Spier agreed to write the decision. (document on file) Approved by unanimous vote at Ethics Commission meeting of November 14, 2005 on motion made by Commissioner Spier and seconded by Commissioner Thomas. Commissioners in attendance were Commissioners Sergio, Spier, Treacy and Thomas.
AMEND BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING:
No votes were taken. All conclusions were reached by general agreement, with no objections raised by any Commissioner.
(3.)ADDENDUM TO MINUTES OF MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 2005
Re: Regular Meeting Minutes Item 9, Closed Session
Commissioners discussed a request from a Board member for an Advisory Opinion concerning potential conflict of interest between his official duties and his employment . Commissioners determined that conflict and/or the appearance of conflict could arise in specific circumstances and advised that the Board member recuse himself from acting if those circumstances should arise. Commissioner Sweeney agreed to write the decision. (document on file)
Approved by unanimous vote at Ethics Commission meeting of November 14, 2005 on motion made by Commissioner Spier and seconded by Commissioner Thomas. Commissioners in attendance were Commissioners Sergio, Spier, Treacy and Thomas.
AMEND BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING:
No votes were taken. All conclusions were reached by general agreement, with no objections raised by any Commissioner.
| 
